Prove what works.
Turn activity across Jira, Entra, GitHub, cloud and more into verifiable control evidence — automated, continuous, and ready before the auditor asks.
Pre-launch. We're building the first version now with a handful of design partners.
The evidence already exists. It's just scattered.
ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, ISAE 3402, SOC 2 — and the security questionnaire that lands in your inbox every time a customer's procurement team gets nervous. Someone on your team is still doing this by hand:
- Collecting screenshots for the auditor's evidence pack
- Digging up the Jira ticket that proves a change was approved
- Checking whether access reviews actually happened this quarter
- Finding incident evidence after the fact, from memory
- Confirming backups were tested — not just scheduled
- Reviewing which privileged accounts still make sense
- Chasing suppliers for their latest security review
- Answering the same 200-question security spreadsheet, again
Kildana watches the systems you already use, and turns activity into evidence for the controls you define.
Connect
Point Kildana at Jira/JSM, Microsoft 365 & Entra, and GitHub to start. Everything else comes in as evidence uploads or via API.
Define your controls
Plain rules, in your words — "privileged production changes must be approved and traceable" — mapped to where the evidence actually lives.
Continuous monitoring
Kildana checks controls on a schedule, not once a year — so drift gets caught in weeks, not at the next audit.
Evidence on demand
"Prepare evidence for ISO 27001 A.8.8, Q3." A portal your auditor can use — not a folder of screenshots.
flowchart LR A["Jira change"] --> B["Approval"] B --> C["Git commit"] C --> D["Deployment"] D --> E["Who performed it"] E --> F["Production system"] F --> G["Control: Change Management
Evidence available"]
AI interprets the evidence. It is never the evidence.
What stays a plain system check
- MFA enabled — read straight from the identity provider
- Access revoked within 24 hours of offboarding — timestamps
- Change approved before it was executed — timestamps
What actually needs judgment
- Does this ticket demonstrate the rollback plan was tested?
- Does this policy satisfy what the framework requires?
- Explaining why a control shows a gap — not just that it does
- 7 production changes had no documented rollback plan
- 2 privileged accounts have not been reviewed this quarter
- 4 terminated users retained access for more than 24 hours
- Backup test evidence is missing for one customer environment
- A supplier security review expired 42 days ago
Five controls, done properly, beats fifty done badly.
Built for the team that keeps getting asked to prove it.
Not enterprise banking procurement — the companies that sell to them, and to regulated customers generally, and are tired of assembling proof by hand.
Kildana produces evidence for these frameworks — it doesn't replace your auditor or certify you. Think of it as the thing that makes the next audit take days, not weeks.
We're looking for a handful of design partners.
If you're assembling audit evidence by hand right now — for ISO 27001, SOC 2, a customer questionnaire, or anything else — we'd like to build this with you, not just for you.